Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

ProShares Short SmallCap600 T.SBB


Primary Symbol: SBB

The investment seeks daily investment results that correspond to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The fund invests in financial instruments that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should produce daily returns consistent with the funds investment objective. The index is a measure of small-cap company U.S. stock market performance. It is a float-adjusted, market capitalization-weighted index of 600 U.S. operating companies selected through a process that factors in criteria such as liquidity, price, market capitalization, financial viability and public float. The fund is non-diversified.


ARCA:SBB - Post by User

Comment by Heywood_Silverson Feb 07, 2022 8:15pm
155 Views
Post# 34406957

RE:Delusional numbers

RE:Delusional numbersUm, yeah, I guess it was absurd that Sabina was $8 a share during the last gold bull heyday a decade ago......whoops, that actually WAS the share price when gold was actually lower than it is today and Sabina had many fewer ounces to boot.

For your edifcation, however, SBB has 9 mm ounces of gold currently delineated.  Throw in the gold equivalent from their Hackett silver royalty and now you are at 10 mm ounces equivalent.

From SBB's presentation, using $2,220 as the future gold price (too conservative for future gold prices btw, but let's use that figure they presented), the NPV for just the proven and probable is $1.96 billion at current exchange rates.  Mind you, P&P represents only 1/3rd of just Goose & Hackett.  Triple that to account for the full 10 billion oz equivalent, and knock off 50% as suitors never pay 100% full NPV of course.  Divide that total by shares outstanding and you arrive at about $8 a share.  Yes, I realize that future extractive costs will rise, but not as fast as the price of gold.

Now, what is George and the blue sky worth?  That isn't even being brought into the mix now is it?  Bruce has already stated that George is more lucrative than Goose, so don't tell me it isn't worth anything.  Please tell me again why YOU think $10 is a ludicrous price?  Better yet, how can YOU justify Great Bear being bought out for $1.42 billion when they have ZERO delineated ounces?!  How does that jive with your reality?

Oh, but you may retort that Great Bear is high grade.  Um, well, isn't SBB projected to be about the highest grade open pit mine in the world?  You may retort, that Great Bear may have more gold than Sabina.  Yeah, and you may win the lottery next month, so what does that prove?  We have no idea how large GB's Dixie project is, however, we know that Back River is a beast of an asset and will produce multiple mines over its vast exploration target area over the generations.

I navigate well past 9:15 my friend, no worries there.  I have had multiple roles in the financial field, some of them being an analyst, so trust me, I know how to analyze an investment!!
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>