RE:After watching JP - Some good pointers When the press release say The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Selects Patriot One Technologies Patron Screening Solution I find this misleading. I have never seen anything from the federal government stating that Patriot One was awarded a tender for this govt building? In fact, its more likely Maven Securities brought Patriot Ones solution into its offering. Moreover if its true that The District of Columbia Protective Services Division has chosen innovative security company, Patriot One Technologies, to provide protection for the D.C can Patriot One provide evidence from The District of Columbia Protective Services Division that that is in fact the case? If not I would question the validity of the statements made by Patriot One as being misleading. Moreover, if this is truly a deal with the Office of Inspector General for D.C. why did Patriot One not include supportive comments from the office in its new release? I only see supportive comments from Maven .... JP I might not agree with your prior comments on various issues relating to PAT but I also recognize your calling it for what it is ...unproven potential at the very most