RE:RE:RE:Did judges wimp out?I've seen a number of comments about the re-trial being '2 years away'. Where is that coming from, precedence? Its hard analyze where this is all going to go; how can Wi-lan be sold with this significant unknown value associated with it? I do not see the logic from any side of this suit wanting further extension of drama by 2 years. I would think some kind of deal is being brokered concurrently between counsels but how do we get this info?