RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:0.27has the company ever communicated a negative development in a timely manner?
sirona communication goes like this:
the big breakthrough with the world's big players in giant markets is imminent.
then time passes without results.
many excuses are found: slow lawyers, big sluggish companies, restructuring processes at the partners, crazy long timelines (what otherwise takes 3-6 weeks, takes at minimum 2 years at sirona), covid, discussions with new partners and so on
Then wexi is slowly shifting his time horizons on the board. the wording in the investor presentations is being adjusted. only grammar of course.
and then a few years later, in a two-line statement, it is admitted that the project has failed or timelines that have not been met are simply no longer discussed.
the only thing that can be accepted as a statement of fact at sirona is the non-announcement of a deal.
when new partners are mentioned in the investor presentation and wexi shifts the time horizon backwards, this means only one thing: TOP 10 Pharma walked away.
This is how it has been in the past, and the likelihood that it will be again increases with each passing day.
the facts are: the clinical trial was completed on March 31, 2021. due diligence was completed in september 2021. that´s five months ago. far too long for finalizing the paperwork.
look at this piece of art:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgpWDYBZyqs
what in there is true except some company names? do you come up with prc-partners because of some expiring warrants?
the only business model i can see is leading the public around by the nose.
what if the public doesn't put up with it? ever thought about that?