RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Preview of the options parade now on SEDI So the only alternative answer is that the SEDI transaction is incorrectly captured?
So don't believe what you see. What you see is wrong. That sounds suspicious. Well, it is QTRHs responsibility to advise them of that and correct it.
It is kind of like QTRH's press release on the Apple outcome. Don't believe what you read, we actually won. Please don't consider the fact that this could delay payment for 3-4 years. And if the jury sides with Apple's theory that they get to advance all over again then we get $25 million. After McKool contingency payment and retroactive payment to Samsung for their Most Favoured Nation Clause, we walk away with nothing? That wasn't in the press release.
Until then, I believe what I see.