RE:RE:RE:RE:Tinley earned the reputation of being aCanada needs change to support the efforts of its players. Plus they have several competitors already on shelves and Tinley has nothing but intentions and some Becketts, I think, but not sure!
The US is where we will make our bones and California is a huge concentrated marketplace of pro-pot consumers from the legal pharma pot days and the blackmarket share that is proving hard to curb.
All things being equal, consumers will migrate to safe, inspected product and value added companies like Tinley can weigh heavily on marketshare because I doubt that the blackmarket will go to that extent of complicating their operations, at least not for a long time.
They may go legit like the mafia did and venture in to value added products but by then the legal potpreneurs will have it sewed up for everything pot other than smokeables.
All potpreneurs, US and others will spring back to life when the US Feds remove the obstacles to allow fair competiton to access that huge American marketplace, or at least the ones that make it 'til US launch.
There is still a whole lot of leaning out and swallowing up for pot players to get right-sized for the markets they intend to do business in and despite Canada breaking bad first, they really haven't stepped up to help Canadian potpreneurs by fixing all of the screw-ups they have made along the road to legalization.
Tinley needs to concentrate on grabbing some success in the US or just Caliornia before they keep fumbling their efforts to go toe to toe with the likes of Canopy and the several other quality thc infused beverages that are already on shelves with a good headstart.
Apparently Tinley made some choices that haven't worked out for rapid launch in Canada and they have done a lot of the same in California although I suspect that in California, that is behind us.
glta and dyodd