RE:RE:What are the oddsPaid Stock bashers like Lou and starsearcher don't try to mislead people do they? I mean if you read starsearchers laundry list, why is there no mention of whisl, bio-steel, Martha Stewart pet and human CBD and Storz and Bickel? Lou is also a paid basher albeit not a very good one. Highlighting a line to try and take it out of context and make it sound like a takeover or merger increasing canopy growth's parent company to a 90 billion dollar market cap is a bad thing. It's such a weak feeble attempt. Not even worth a laugh.
It's because his handlers want him to bash this stock so he only mentions the negative. With every company there's good and bad, including with canopy. However, canopy has set themselves up for Big Picture success not small-market over-regulated tiny profits. His job as a stock basher is to try to control the narrative and get people to engage with him talking about his narrative. That is why he puts out all those questions in order to control your response and the narrative. Don't fall for it. His posts aren't worth the bandwidth used to generate them.
Doubleeagles wrote: Grasping for air. And the sticking point has nothing to do with Canopy. It's Coca Cola jeesh read your own post. Love the attempt to mislead though.