RE:RE:RE:Thoughts on the Scotia 250k bid movement?Redwine12345 wrote: So what? Tinley trades are not under investigation....
Maybe they should be!!! Tinley has had some problems and delays, no doubt in my mind but what if there are Fund Managers and marketmakers ganging up and manipulating the trading of this company stock.
It's quite possible that what Tinley is doing right now which is delivering on its businessplan to get us to black ink, is the solution.
I didn't invest in this because it is a flash in the pan idea and with more competition lining up to follow our efforts, it makes me even more assured that Tinley is a company of the times or ahead of the times.
What if some of that mighty competition is playing its own marketmaker's game with our company by exercising influence in a concerted effort to give them time to catch up or keep our price in a rut until they are ready to swoop in and acquire us.
It is difficult to keep up with the changing stock market vehicles and manouvering designed by whiz kids with computers and no sense of impropriety or unfairness or unscrupulous traders that can stick together and make up the tales of woe or success and disseminate them to get their algobots triggered to buy and sell whichever compay they have in their crosshairs. The companies like Tinley that are affected might not even be able to trace who and where this is coming from.
When you build a company like Tinley as a junior startup, most of the startup capital is from friends and family and more and more investment is required to try to implement and produce your product lines to profitability. Not an easy thing to do when the playing field is full of mines and they change the rules on the fly.
Tinley already wrote off 2000 cases because of a relabelling issue which by my calculation could have been a killer for a small company. 24 bottles a case at $20 a bottle revenue potential is looking like a million dollars'ish to me plus handling and dumping costs. The minute our products are produced they become liabilities to shelf life, breakage and other stuff like labelling changes or somebody making the rules changing the strength of magic ingredient to less than what you produced.
That could have killed us on its own and delays out of our control for inspections, bottleline building and other issues can be argued as bad management but I am sure that our team knows the clock is ticking and the costs keep coming in so what to you do. You keep going until you are where we are at now.
I daresay this is the turning point as Tinley's in California is turning a corner to profitability. The sun isn't going to shine on Tinley until we see revenue and good margins for our own skus and co-bottling fees.
It could all be smoke and mirrors done with bits and bytes but I still think we are on to something and that posters will be held to honesty for the pictures of our production line doing what it is built for and being expanded for. Expanding our operation before we are making money suggests that our team is confident and I'm hoping for a Redditt/Gamestop moment where Tinley's shareholders can pull of a squeezeplay like Tilray did not so long ago. $150 per share to $300 is a helluva squeeze.
I am a huge believer in cannabinoid infused beverages and the profit margins and high turnover that they are capable of, especially if we take a bite into Beverage Alcohol, which to me, is a no-brainer for a healthier vice compelete with less calories, less sugar and possibly a little something-something for aches, pains, sleep and anxiety. That spell good times to me, on par with alcohol but safer imho.
Tinley's businessplan is viable and delivering profits is the key to getting the kind of recognition for our shareprice that I think is due.
Let's take it to those maggot marketmaker bullies with our brand new vice and get our lunch money back. Just don't sell, and if you are a believer, hit the asks with a little premium.
glta and dyodd