Over at the c_o.ca site
Semendemon asked: Wonder how the underwriters are doing selling @ 4.60
0
@Semendemon answered:
this better get back up there fast or i guess they hold or sell at loss The underwriters collectively simply can't lose.
Here's a thought
? Perhaps both CannaOcrap and National Banak Financial, merely two of the syndicate of underwriters particpating in this $30M bought deal capital raise, 'sold GRA shares short' and/or had their "high net worth clients" sell GRA shares short at heights from which the share price was quite intentionally made to collapse.
Sure, now this syndicate of underwriters, two of which are all too conveniently CannaOcrap Genuity and National Banak Financial, show up with a impecably timed willingness to provide NanoXplore $30M by way of a bought deal capital raise; doing so at a fixed share price of $4.60 per share - that's quite a long way down from circa $9.00 per share, eh.
A $4.60 price point, I'll remind you, which is notably further discouted to even the preceding 30 day average GRA share price.
NOTE: This semendemon character, some person who is posting over at the ceo.ca site, suggested that should the syndicate of underwriters collectively not manage to have NanoXplore's share price rebound very quickly upwards, the syndicate of underwriters collectively could stand a chance at having "to sell at a loss".
RESPONSE: LOL! You better ask yourself whether the intention on the part of the syndicate of underwriters is to secure, for their 'high net worth clients and their respective own book, enough GRA shares with which to cover their collective intention to further 'sell short' NanoXplore shares immediately following this $30M bought deal capital raise closing
? "Holy jumping Jehoshaphat Bataman!", That had better not be the case.
Note: Should the syndicate of underwriters intend at any point to collectively sell GRA shares short, does this semendemon character think that such a syndicate of underwriters could collectively 'lose' in selling GRA share short
?
I sure as sugar don't expect any of the underwriters, especially CannaOcrap Genuity or National Bank Financial, to ever somehow lose from having been exclusively provided their collective control of their own provided GRA positions and/or the control over their respective 'high net worth client' purchases of GRA positions
. Here's another thought for all NanoXplore share holders to consider.
Should the GRA share price continue to fall because certain institutional GRA share holders have been continuing to and would be continuing to have a grand old time quite profitably selling GRA shares short, doing so from circa $9.00 all the way down to present share price points, NanoXplore C-suite representatives 'may have figured' that they would allow their selected 'syndicate of underwriters' to have access to the control of enough GRA shares with which to either
: (
a) keep 'a disciplined control over' and just about exclusively profit from any would be coming increased sell off in NanoXplore shares
or (
b) perhaps 'prime' any unexpected "PUMPS" of NanoXplore's share price, i.e. should any other 'undisciplined' and therefore entirely 'unwelcomed' institutional investors amass enough of a GRA short position with which to any further attempt to profit from selling GRA short
?