RE:RE:RE:Over at the c_o.ca siteNOTE: Every one of your suggested particpants in this bought deal offering are not primarily deploying their own monies in support of purchasing the respectively apportioned amount of NanoXplore shares made availiable by way of this $30M capital raise.
Also note that what I stated previously stands, i.e. should the high net worth clients, investors whom such underwriters are purchasing their apportioned amount of shares on behalf of, be made to lend their shares to a concerted effort to continue selling short NanoXplore shares, there would be much more carnage with respect to the lower share price points which could be achieved going forward.
You didn't bother to answer the most important questions which I posed, i.e. is a there a stipulated hold period attached to any of the NanoXplore shares offered by way of this $30M bought deal capital raise?
In seeking to balance the forestated with another perhaps more positive possibility, I'll state the following.
Should everything be progressing quite positively with respect to the VoltaXplore enterprise, there is little reason for a VoltaXplore co-owner and NanoXplore 'material share holder', namely Martinrea International, not to want to take up a even greater ownership of NanoXplore.
In fact, unless NanoXplore agreed to and did provide 'anti dilution' specific stipulations, as could have been attached to Martinrea International's previously purchased 'material ownership position' in NanoXplore, Martinrea International stands to experience dilution to their material ownership of NanoXplore Inc, by way of this $30M bought deal capital raise and any other capital raise to come.
Should such dilution of Martinrea International's material NanoXplore position in fact be allowed by Martinrea International representatives to happen, that is something which certainly could indicate that Martinrea International Inc representatives could be interested in actually allowing a third party into the NanoXplore mix and the VoltaXplore partnership venture.
Hmm? Who would be the third material owner' of NanoXplore and a requisite partner and co-owner of the VoltaXplore enterprise be?
I've previously mentioned the potential candidates and would be co-owners and co-owning partners for nanoXplore and the VoltaXplore enterprise respectively.
You'll note that the compay name I have long known about and have intentionally kept to myself (exept to share it with one 'special' other poster here at this buletin board), is a company located within the U.S.
It's a company which is a serious NanoXplore competitor maintaining a certain 'heavy weight' investor; a heavy weight investor that happens to 'hold the note' which such a NanoXplore U.S based competitor had previously issued to such a behemoth of a "U.S Industrial Titan".
Perhaps more on this later.
For now, it is VoltaXplore which most are awaiting for to help boost the share price.