RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vertex and Witkowski PartnershipIt was created on 2017-06-21 but is still relevant and agree it's a positive for SVA. Not so with stem cells. Once you put them in, thats it. You cant withdraw them. Theres no kill switch. Sigilon is a good example of another problem that could arise and reason beyond cancer of why these cells should be easy to remove. The immune system could start to recognize and attack the insulin produced by Vertex's iPSC cells.
BioTeck wrote: Not sure how old this article is but a positive for SVA until vertex announces their device. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/stem_cell_research/safety_ethics/are_induced_pluripotent_stem_cells_safe_yet.html
MustangSalley wrote: Bio,
Where did they prove there is no concerns about no concerns for tumours ? The premise of a device is so that the cells maybe be retrievable because in the past stem cells went to areas and caused tumours . Vertex is dumping preembryonic cells in the portal vein . There is insulin independence but we don't know for how long .
I believe the race will be between Vertex and Sva in the end . Your insertion that Vertex could buy Sva will only happen if they need a device and time will tell.
Ms Sally ... no lidocaine needed