Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

NeutriSci International Inc V.NU.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  NRXCF

NeutriSci International Inc. (NeutriSci) is a Canada-based company, which specializes in the production, and formulation of nutraceutical products within the business-to-business (B2B) industry. The Company is focused on the market development for its nutraceutical products. Its products utilize patented form of Pterostilbene called pTeroPure. pTeroPure Pterostilbene is a form of all-trans Pterostilbene that is found naturally in blueberries and is manufactured for NeutriSci by ChromaDex Corp. (ChromaDex) in the United States. NeutriSci’s neuenergy product is an energy tab designed to deliver enhanced focus and mental clarity with no sugar, no calories and no crash that is associated with energy products. It has developed proprietary IP and technology (NeutriSci IP) that creates an efficient method of bilingual absorption of nutraceuticals into the bloodstream. NeutriSci’s IP can be applied to many different categories in the beverage, food, and nutraceutical space.


TSXV:NU.H - Post by User

Comment by Edcandoon Feb 20, 2022 11:02pm
76 Views
Post# 34447246

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Let’s

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Let’s

I was even very supportive at the beginning because we got caught with our pants down and didn't know what we were dealing with . I'm certainly not anti vax either.  I'll even agree it doesn't all even have to be any kind of conspiracy.  Much of it could even be considered proper science with trial and error. The problem here being they rarely if ever admitted the errors . IM going to post a link about a study out of John Hopkins that studied 34 other peer reviewed covid studies. This showed that all lockdowns and measures (they didn't say vaccines themselves didn't help) only saved about 0.2% lives (1/5th of one percent) . This speaks only to covid and measures. This doesn't even factor in all the ancillary devastation of those lockdowns and closures etc. worse yet this is speaking to the beginning. I've already said I was supportive at the beginning. Problem is 2 years in things have changed even more and it's now also not having any effect on hospitalizations etc. 

Since your hateful personal attacks distracted  me before , I didn't get a chance to mention that I respect your wife for her noble position. I've been a big vocal fan since long before covid and have always felt they are overworked, underfunded/appreciated and underpaid. None of that changes the ironic stigmatizing gaslighting of the past 6 months. Now especially cases, hospitalizations and deaths are all coming down to their lowest rates in over a year. Provinces , many states, and a growing list of other countries are all opening up. We've had thousands upon thousands of people coast to coast (and all over the world) dancing, hugging, and kisisng maskless shoulder to shoulder for just about a month while all metrics have dropped. Of the 5 states that border Ontario 3 are fully open on the other side. Mandates dropping everywhere, yet trudeau is doubling down and we know why. His own MP came out against him and his plan (yes a conspiracy since it involved more than 2 people and was made in secret) to drive wedges with a campaign of divisive rhetoric and gaslit stigmatization. 3 more came out and agreed. 2 said there were many more who felt the same. I also see you didn't comment on my "because science" post. Those restrictions actually make scientific sense to anyone?  

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>