RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Over at the c_o.ca siteThis is all getting a bit silly, 1Student. If your scenario was to play ourt there would have had to have been a large short position reported Feb 17- 22 at the very least: the reported short position was about 160,000 shares (miniscule) on those days, so that makes your narrative somewhat suspect in any case.
In point of fact, HAD the underwriters and/or their close, substantial clients held short positions, the issue could have been significantly more successful and may not now be trading at a substantial discount.
As to the rest, have an opinion and theory if you will, but don't present it as some kind of self- evident fact and use it to smear both people and companies.
I'm with Multilex on this one, but it could take some time to get this train back on track.
Enough said, let's move on.
Allons, mes amis !