Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

NanoXplore Inc T.GRA

Alternate Symbol(s):  NNXPF

NanoXplore Inc. is a Canada-based graphene company. It is a manufacturer and supplier of high-volume graphene powder for use in transportation and industrial markets. It provides standard and custom graphene-enhanced plastic and composite products to various customers in transportation, packaging, electronics, and other industrial sectors. Its Advanced materials, plastics and composite products segment provides standard and custom graphene-enhanced plastic and composite products to various customers in transportation, packaging, electronics, and other industrial sectors. Its Battery cells segment provides silicon-graphene-enhanced Li-ion battery for the Electric Vehicle and grid storage markets. Its products include GrapheneBlack powder and graphene-enhanced masterbatch pellets using its extrusion capabilities that support various polymers. GrapheneBlack powder is suitable for a range of applications, it is especially useful for improving the properties of plastics and polymers.


TSX:GRA - Post by User

Comment by Lire02on Feb 22, 2022 11:39am
101 Views
Post# 34450391

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Over at the c_o.ca site

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Over at the c_o.ca siteThis is all getting a bit silly, 1Student. If your scenario was to play ourt there would have had to have been a large short position reported Feb 17- 22 at the very least: the reported short position was about 160,000 shares (miniscule) on those days, so that makes your narrative somewhat suspect in any case.

In point of fact, HAD the underwriters and/or their close, substantial clients held short positions, the issue could have been significantly more successful and may not now be trading at a substantial discount.

As to the rest, have an opinion  and theory if you will, but don't present it as some kind of self- evident fact and use it to smear both people and companies.

I'm with Multilex on this one, but it could take some time to get this train back on track. 

Enough said, let's move on.

Allons, mes amis ! 


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>