RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Nice recovery @Phil, with the utmost respect, comparatively speaking there is absolutely no liquidity crunch on AGG's shares as there is on Robex's shares.
If you would only apply the same level of deep analysis and precision to the historical trading volumes of RBX and AGG that you have applied in your last Stockhouse post to their historical comparative share prices, and are willing to be straightup about it, as opposed to a being member of the cheerleading squad, then I think you'll corrrect the record.
As for their comparative share price, it's interesting to me that when I do a search of the public company records on SEDAR, RBX's file cuts off after 25 years.
Put another way, the maximum that SEDAR goes back is a quarter century. Which means that for at least 22 years (ie amost a quarter century), and I assume even longer because SEDAR only goes back 25 years, RBX bounced along the bottom as a public company until, in your view, it achieved stardom. Think about that long and hard in terms of your price comparison to AGG and your chosen time frames for comparison....
We are investors.
We are neither cheerleaders nor sycophants to wealthy French families.
As investors, we continually attempt to identify stocks that are trading below their intrinsic value.
Stocks that for whatever reasons Mr. Market is fatigued by, weary with and whom he has given up all hope on, yet those stocks possess true underlying value. No mean feat, everone would do it if it were, but that is how success in public company investing is consistently (not one-off lucky picks) and ultimately achieved.