Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Trilogy Metals Inc T.TMQ

Alternate Symbol(s):  TMQ

Trilogy Metals Inc. is a Canada-based metal exploration and development company that holds a 50% interest in Ambler Metals LLC, which has a 100% interest in the Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects (UKMP) in Northwestern Alaska. It focuses on UKMP, including the Arctic and Bornite Projects. The UKMP is located within the Ambler Mining District. It hosts polymetallic volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits that contain copper, zinc, lead, gold and silver, and carbonate replacement deposits which have been found to host high-grade copper and cobalt mineralization. The Arctic deposit is a polymetallic volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit located approximately 470 kilometers northwest of the City of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Bornite deposit (Bornite) is a carbonate hosted copper-cobalt deposit located near Kobuk, Alaska, and is approximately 25 kilometers southwest of the Company’s Arctic Project. It also conducts early-stage exploration through a wholly owned subsidiary, 995 Exploration Inc.


TSX:TMQ - Post by User

Post by templetooth2on Feb 24, 2022 4:22pm
182 Views
Post# 34459535

from The Washington Post

from The Washington Post
Another angle to this story.  Doesn't sound to me like this will be solved in short order. Rather, this situation looks capable of generating billable hours for a lot of lawyers:


The Alaska road sign number one shows direction to the west on scenic route of Glenn highway. (iStock)

The Biden administration on Tuesday said it found “significant deficiencies” in a Trump-era environmental analysis of a mining road that would cut through wilderness and Indigenous territory in northwest Alaska.

The construction of Ambler Road is one of the most high-profile environmental issues in Alaska, as it would bring 211 miles of new road through one of the largest roadless areas in the country.

The Interior Department said in a statement that the road proposal — which includes about 50 miles of Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service land — would cross the traditional homelands of Alaska Native communities including the Koyukon, Tanana Athabascans and Iupiat peoples.

In a federal court filing Tuesday, the administration asked the U.S. District Court for Alaska to send the permit approval back to the department so it can conduct a new environmental analysis. Interior said that it would suspend the right of way for the road while it carried out the new assessment “to ensure that no ground-disturbing activity takes place that could potentially impact the resources in question.”

Alaska Native groups endorsed the decision.

“The 200+ Ambler road represents a fundamental threat to our people, our subsistence way of life and our cultural resources,” Brian Ridley, president of the Tanana Chiefs Conference, a nonprofit representing 42 tribes in interior Alaska, said in a statement. “We appreciate that the federal government recognized the flaws in the previous administration’s decisions to permit the road.”

Some opponents of the road found the Biden administration’s decision lacking. Trustees for Alaska, an environmental group that has sued to stop the road, criticized the administration for not revoking the permits and said it “failed to acknowledge the full and long list of legal problems with the Interior Department’s approval process.”

“This project never should have been authorized in the first place, and the agencies can’t fix their broken analysis by papering over their mistakes after the fact,” Suzanne Bostrom, senior staff attorney with Trustees for Alaska, said in a statement.

The road, approved in July 2020, would run from the Dalton Highway north of Fairbanks west to the Ambler Mining District, where there are valuable deposits of zinc, copper, gold, cobalt and other metals. It has been a high priority for Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R) and the state’s congressional delegation.

Alaska’s congressional leaders, including its Republican senators, Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, condemned the Biden administration’s decision on the road and said it will harm Alaska.

“America’s lack of mineral security should be one of the Biden administration’s highest priorities, but its incoherent policies are making the problem worse,” Murkowski said in a statement. “It’s stunning: on the very same day the President attempted to tout ‘progress’ on mineral development, his administration backtracked and set back this crucial project, which will enable Alaska to responsibly produce a range of needed minerals.”

The mine developers, Ambler Metals LLC, — a joint venture between the Australian mining firm South32 Ltd. and Vancouver-based Trilogy Metals — and the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, planned to spend nearly $60 million this year in preparation for the road and associated mines in the area.

Ambler Metals and the state development bank did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Environmentalists and tribes have been concerned that the road and the associated mining projects that it would access would cause significant harm to rivers, streams and wildlife in the area. They have said the road would cross 11 river systems and require dozens of bridges and thousands of culverts.

Residents are particularly concerned that the road could interrupt caribou migration that Indigenous communities depend on for subsistence and bring more development to the isolated region.

Conservation and tribal groups sued to block the road and argued that it would pollute the environment and harm their way of life. Tribal representatives also say they have not been sufficiently consulted by the road developers during the preparation of the project.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>