Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Naturally Splendid Enterprises Ltd V.NSP.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  NSPDF

Naturally Splendid Enterprises Ltd. is a Canada-based company, which develops and distributes healthy lifestyle foods and products. The Company owns Prosnack Natural Foods Inc. (Prosnack Natural Foods), a food manufacturing facility. Prosnack Natural Foods focusses on nutritional bars, Chii Naturally Pure Hemp, which is a retail line of hemp food products, while Pawsitive FX is a line of all natural balms for dogs. The Company has also developed technologies for the extraction of healthy omega three and six oils, as well as a protein concentrate from hemp. It focuses on manufacturing and distributing an extensive line of plant-based, meat-alternative entrees. It offers functional foods under brands, such as Natera Sport, Natera Hemp Foods, CHII and Elevate Me.


TSXV:NSP.H - Post by User

Comment by divot111on Feb 25, 2022 7:35pm
49 Views
Post# 34463590

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Longtheshorts

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:LongtheshortsYou said you read everything. That would be the original claim the way it was stated and the example he gave that I in turn just gave to you. I asked specifically for the equation using the numbers bagcheese gave that proves his scenario. Now you claim you don't know what I am talking about and you didn't do the math?  Kind of odd being you claim his math is correct. Obviously his math isn't correct in relation to the original claim if you can not take the example he provided and do the math accordingly. You just said all you need to say. I will continue to wait for the math that confirms his example. Maybe someone else can provide all the info I am seeking. Why do others just argue and not provide the facts to back them up?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>