Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Alta Copper Corp. T.DNT


Primary Symbol: T.ATCU

ALTA COPPER CORP. IS AN EMERGING COPPER DEVELOPER ADVANCING WITH THE GLOBAL SHIFT TOWARD ELECTRIFICATION AND DECARBONIZATION. Alta Copper Corp. is focused on the development of its 100% owned Cañariaco advanced staged copper project. Cañariaco comprises 97 square kilometers of highly prospective land located 150 kilometers northeast of the City of Chiclayo, Peru, which include the Cañariaco Norte deposit, Cañariaco Sur deposit and Quebrada Verde prospect, all within a 4km NE-SW trend in northern Peru¿s prolific mining district. Cañariaco is one of the largest copper deposits in the Americas not held by a major.


TSX:ATCU - Post by User

Comment by jetickaon Feb 26, 2022 11:51am
95 Views
Post# 34464388

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:War and base metals

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:War and base metals
DeepdiveN wrote: In May 1997, at the NATO Summit in Paris, France, NATO and Russia signed the Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security, a road map for would-be NATO-Russia cooperation. NATO said it had no plans to station nuclear weapons in the new (!) member states or send in new permanent military forces. These are the official historical facts. Seems your oppinion is very much aligned with the official Russian twist and definetely misplaced in the DNT forum. Regards from Germany as well


Historically needed to add Americans weren´t pleased by idea of Russians missiles in Cuba in 1962, but to have military bases tens ok km from Russian border - it ´s apparently cool and who cares that Russian dictator Putin doesn´t want it?

 First negotiation was in 1991 during reunion of Germany with handshake that NATO will not expand to the eastern Europe, second in Paris 1997.
 
I believe for Ukrainians it wasn´t a theme until Maidan "orange revolution, some could call it coup d´tat. Eastern part of Ukraine stayed pro-Russian, these people had very negative experiences with Ukrainian "pro-western" politicians which were characterized mainly by kleptomania ( Yulia Timoscenkova etc.)

Zelenskyj had more than a month to negotiate with Putin on 2 points - Donbass/Luhansk autonomy and non-entry to NATO, but he blindly believed American and British representatives that they will stand side by side with Ukrainians against Putin´s agression. Such stupidity - never in history of the world any superpower didn´t defend small country against another superpower, on top of that when the enemy has nuclear and hypersonic weapons.
 The result is just now fratricidal struggle in Ukraina, Putin has a sticker of a new Hitler ( wasn´t he Austrian?) and Biden and Johnson are in the lee and satisfied like disrupted European continent partnership, eastern countries ( mainly Poland and Baltic republics) are upset at moderate Germany, France, Italy, US will reach to stop Nord Stream II., Johnson is glad media are writing about Putin´s agression and not about Downing street 9 parties. I would like to know if this guy would pass though drug test personally...

Regards from Czech Republic as well 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>