MMIOne exploration method that has seen a lot of success in defining targets, especially gold targets, is the Mobile Metal Ion soil sampling method, known as MMI. It's a relatively easy tool to use, and would be useful in a geological environment such as within the Link Catharine property. Come Spring, a few orientation lines may be considered. That said, here are some suggestions:
Main Gold Zone
NS lines to cover any potential EW fault zone, 2 lines east of CA-20-01 collar and lines west to the property boundary. Extend the NS lines southerly in order to cover the major inferred EW fault zone.
2 or 3 EW lines to cover any potential NS shear zone.
100m line spacing with 50m stations.
Large Magnetic Low (syenite?)
2 NS lines to cover entire magnetic low anomaly
2 EW lines to cover entire magnetic low anomaly
100m line spacing with 50m stations
center the lines over the middle of the magnetic low
the EW lines should go east to the property boundary
CA-21-15
One EW line to cover the area from the drill collar, east to the property boundary covering the RTA Zone, and then well past the inferred Shear Zone Complex.
50m stations
Zones F and G
One EW line from just west of Zone F, then east through Zone G and then directly east to the property boundary, covering the Shear Zone Complex, as well as the RTA Zone.
50m stations
This information would complement the 3D IP data, and if there was any correlation between the two data sets, then the chances of success for finding gold would be greatly improved as a drill target. Copper should also be analyzed, along with the gold package. Again, the above is just a suggestion.