RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Facebook Pumpers ?
nope I was not. Remember what I said with the Dugalas the stock without revenue will be $2.50 plus but depending on revenue and development more. That was based on a paradigm shifting tech...$3.76 and collapsed no revenue right so the shares collapsed!!! Now Flash forward I said the equity will not make or keep above $1.00 without revenue...ran to $1.07 recently IF you recall I said .18 was bottom this is where whiney Snake biatched and started to bash again. I had said it will not sustain it again without remember BUT also remember what I put the value at and where I still place it I said given 3 big partners the company should not be valued less than .50 minimum for each partner assessing a fair bottom market value at $1.50 to $2.00 awhile after someone posted Morning Star putting fmv at $1.20 which despite being way better than low .20s I still disagree with. So I had qualified everything based on revenue or not and recently called the .18 bottom AND clearly said that the price will not make a buck without revenue it did but did it keep it...NOPE. now remember what I also said I said without one of the big three this sees revenue $1.00 to $2.00 depending on what they are. With a big three $2 plus again depending what it is. A big three plus 2 to 3 others I said this can hit $2 to $5 plus and with 2 or more big three $10 plus again depending on what the revenue is. Do I think we will see huge revenue right away NO! Do I think the price will project beyond it YES as stocks are supposedly forward looking as well as people finally waking up to the fact this is the real deal and being a preferred partner to the big three will attract as we are seeing AND stated companies at various stages Start Ups more established mid tier as well as like those of the BIG Three. Why don't you screenshot all this and see where all this stands huh? I will screenshoot it so I am very certain this has been consistently said.