RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Was Lena The Most Qualified Candidate?Investors are CLEARLY forgetting that the fundamentals don't fit the sp. For anyone who has spent a long time investing there are numerous examples of this and it has only escalated with a watering down of regulations. Thus it can be extremely challenging to try to explain or rationalize sp movement.
The fact is that ScreenPro had significant revenues through their first 3 quarters as a company. The fact is that this has likely resulted in annual revenues of over $20 million for their first year of operation ...including moving from debt to profit.
The fact is Lena came in after an 8 MONTH downward trajectory of the sp from $1.00 and inherited a business plan that was still focussed on covid testing. At this stage most investors when comparing to other companies with similar fundamentals and/or focus had every reason to believe the sp should be better ....and if the downward trend continued it should not be laid at the feet of the new CEO.
I'm no fan of what has happened with ScreenPro (I accept that I own some of my choices/losses) but until the 2021 Annual Financials are released and and update on expectations for Q1 and Q2 2022 are released this company still has wheels.
SY3XElon wrote: Is this a stalling tactic? Trying to take the heat off for a period of time? Since Lena became CEO on September 1st, using pre split numbers, SP has gone from .03 to .007. Or post split numbers .30 to .07. That is a fact
mutjwo wrote: Lena even mentioned during the webinar they are working on things within the company that won't just happen over night