RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New Spin on Drill ResultsIn the February Press release that announced improved metalurgical results used a sample that used a Ni grade of 0.19 had a S/Ni ratio of 0.37.
One way to put this arguement to bed once and for all, find a hole with a decent grade (above .3) and a low S ratio
In the PEA hole CR 19-23 has a nickle grade of 0.33, with a sulfur grade of .08. That gives us a S/N ratio of 0.24. There seems to be quite a few of these interdispersed among the holes in the PEA.
Run the recovery tests on that sample and see what we get. Is it possible that a prosepective SI did just that in their due dilligence, saw the results and said, thanks but no thanks?