RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:VoltaXplore's 18650 battery.Yes. JimmyBly1. I agree that comments regrading NanoXplore and the VoltaXplore enterprise are definitely more grounded.
I expect experiencing a continuously collapsing GRA share price, whilst doggedly holding on to my GRA share position until I finally read and fully realized what the"risk wrought" writing on the wall was clearly conveying for me, so to speak . . .
Suffice to say that such a experience of "made to be" lost profit would certainly bring anybody's then immediate expectations "down to earth", so to speak.
You would have noticed that it was obviously after such a realization that I adopted and began to convey a most cautious tone by way of what I presented here at the GRA bulletin board.
Sufficed to say that when I found out about the amended shelf prospectus filing, with respect to the potential materially dilutive $500M capital raise, it was then that I began to listen to and react to the realization of a then "greatly increased risk profile" being applied to holding NanoXplore shares.
It was also then that I certainly realized and knew I was to face and experience potentially "material dilution" clearly decimating my then NanoXplore equity position.
I wasn't going to have any of that; so I naturally stepped aside taking the overwhelming majority of my NanoXplore share position off the table for the time being JimmyBly1.
Obviously, I didn't entirely dodge a bullet there, so to speak. I took and am now taking a relatively smaller although never the less quite sizable hit to my NanoXplore share position.
All this to consider whilst Paradigm Capital's Marvin J. Wolff and that "hack writter", who until the very day confirmation of the markedly discounted bought deal financing was publicly disseminated and the consequent GRA share price collapse resulted, were collectively quite intentionally "promoting" their claim that retail share holders should have then been buying NanoXplore shares at then markedly higher price points and by the boatload .
Such shenanigans on the part of Paradigm Capital et al., clearly tell you what Paradigm Capital principals and said company's employed and leveraged "minions" were and are always most willing to subject retail NanoXplore share holders to.
In my opinion, like CannaOcrap Genuity and/or plenty of others, their "name is mudd"
NOTE: I had been riding the GRA share price downward without selling until not long before the $30M bought deal offering price at $4.60.
That is when the NanoXplore share price "gave up the ghost" so to speak; and in doing so collapsed from well above $5.00 to well below the eventually announced $4.60 bought deal offering price, then continuing to be pushed even farther downward to $3.57.
You say I don't care; and yet I certainly do JimmyBly1.
As I said, I took and am now taking a relatively smaller although never the less sizable hit to my overall NanoXplore share position.
As always, Caveat Emptor