RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:MTD I think you are reading way to much into that as what that colloquialism means down here is that they aren't that AT ALL, not leaving the antithesis any room. As a lawyer would tell you, it s impossible to be definitive 100% unless you actually know, and I don't. I am guessing based on what I see, but I can't pretend to know 100% of what they do.
jfm1330 wrote: This sentence is really something. Think about it twice. It means that they are unscientific or unprofessionnal to some extent. Why would you invest in such a company or stay invested? And how can you expect such relatively unscientific or unprofessional people to promote the stock? How relatively unscientific people can be trusted to develop a valid drug that will end up as a commercial success? This board is totally lost in an irrational love/hate relation with this company. This little sentence is just a reflection of that. Half incompetent company will develop a great effective anti-cancer drug. Again. Think about it twice.
Wino115 wrote: They aren't that unscientific or unprofessional from what I can see.