RE:RE:RE:If you listen to only one presentation, jump on now... Minewatch certainly seemed better prepared, and the content was presented well relative to yesterdays presentation. Their questions and issues seemed centred on jobs and whether they were net or gross (it probably would have been helpful for Drew to refer to TBEDC's presentation which referenced the Greenstone construction workforce moving on to Marathon - so while not net new jobs, certainly important to continuous employment) and camp housing. I somewhat get the hang up on housing, but would have to think in the big picture, it's small potatoes. They also implied that recycling of cat converters was ample to meet future demand for palladium thus negating the need for new pallladium supply/mines. Lots of emotion in their presentation - would have been better sticking to facts and drawing better conclusions.
I was particularly struck by BN's statement insisting that they would represent their own best interests taking exception with todays and yesterdays presenters making statements and claims on their behalf. Good for BN.
The panel questions seemed quite fair, and looked to serve GENM well by clarifying their statements, while seeming to counter statements and questions asked by Minewatch.