RE:RE:RE:RE:Interesting....Accountprince wrote: MM - I agree that pieces will fall into place in the short term. All the missing info and disclosures will need to be brought up to date. There seems to be a sense that something has been or is in the works.
Although the new CFO has NASDAQ experience they highlight his experience in taking the company he worked for private from the NASDAQ. I feel if they wanted to do a NASDAQ listing it would have happened by now. His "going private" experience is a curious item to include in the background info of a newly hired CFO. Gotta give them credit for full disclosure though.
Some good points AP
You mean full disclosure, on certain issues, when it serves a purpose, I assume?
Agree on Nasdaq...perhaps they need to show potential buyers that they have a secondary endgame option if the price isn't right?
There ceases to be a need for a Company (much less a public one) once you have sold off your NA Rights X 2 (and your worldwide rights X 1). Clean-up on aisle 3
MM