RE:RE:Disastrous!!Capharnaum wrote: monte8 wrote: For a small company fighting in courts for years and now finally winning from a bahemoth this is only what we get? A slap in the face to the investors who have stayed for years.. The share price is once again eroding.
Management and the board have alot of answering to do. Fiuciary duty???
Everything is confidential and the investors get burned !!!!
What do you mean, this is all we get? How much do we get? Are you saying that they shouldn't have signed a licensing agreement because Apple asked that the amount remain confidential?
Sure anyone can "request confidentiality" but when there are responsibilities (and I can't believe there isn't a law) those requests are over ruled. Ethically if there isn't accepted guidelines QTR owes it to the shareholders IMO.