Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc T.ATD

Alternate Symbol(s):  ANCTF

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. is engaged in convenience and mobility, operating in about 29 countries and territories, with more than 16,700 stores, of which almost 13,100 offer road transportation fuel. With its Couche-Tard and Circle K banners, the Company is an independent convenience store operator in the United States, and it is engaged in the convenience store industry and road transportation fuel retail in Canada, Scandinavia, the Baltics, as well as in Ireland. It also has a presence in Poland, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands. Its North American network consists of about 17 business units, including 14 in the United States covering 47 states and three in Canada covering all 10 provinces. In Europe, it operates a broad retail network across Scandinavia, Ireland, Poland, and the Baltics through seven business units. Its operating brands include Circle K, Couche-Tard, and Ingo.


TSX:ATD - Post by User

Comment by BearBullBrianon Mar 24, 2022 5:05pm
114 Views
Post# 34543224

RE:CIBC

RE:CIBCHmmm...The upside scenario is a 21% increase over the base case, while the downside scenario is a 50% decrease from the base case. I guess that says that if couche tard falters, it will be more a spectacular fail than if they over achieve. I guess the projections don't take into account the likelihood of each scenario happening, which would make them more useful in an investment context. Because if you believe each scenario projection to have an equal likelihood of occurring, I'm not sure that couche tard would be a good investment in this context.

Having confused myself throughly, I'm going to walk the dog to clear my head.

BBB

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>