RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Delay in Phase 1 a --------Get over itThe Gallium 68 imaging part should be in their short term plan if they think they have proof of concept. Toxicity is not a potential problem with Ga68, they should absolutely pursue it with animal model asap just to validate or not this path. The therapeutic side is more complicated because potential toxicity is a real issue, and it would be a long term endeavour to develop that, but doing the imagery part in animal models would already give them more insight into the therapeutic possibilities and about the behaviours of their peptide, organ and tissue distribution, internalization speed into cells, concentration into cells, etc...
As for me knowing more than Christian about PRRT, I will leave it at that. Thera likes to communicate with coded incomplete messages. I will do the same on this one.
SPCEO1 wrote: Guarantee is a strong word so it sounds like you know of what you speak. I guess there is good news and bad news in that. Good news that there is still a chance to do that analysis and bad news that it has not yet be done.
<br /> <br />
jfm1330 wrote: I can guarantee you that he is not...<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote class="BBQuote"> <div> <cite>SPCEO1 wrote:</cite> I am pretty sure Christian is on top of such things way more than any of us, even JFM.</div> </blockquote> <br /> <br />
<br /> <br />