RE:RE:RE:No reverse split an NSRPlazeHarmonica wrote: YetAnother1 wrote: Currower wrote: A reverse split is a waste of time and only assists the people accumulating shares from retail. An apple divided 5 or ten ways is the same apple. What is FAIR to shareholders would be a 2 percent NSR on the 40 sq Kms of land adjacent to Detour East for all Wallbridge's shareholders like GBRR. No cost and it will drive the sp up immediately.AGM in May. GLTAL REAL WALLBRIDGE INVESTORS except Agnico
I don't disagree with the NSR idea.
On everything west of Fenelon. Those without prior agreements of course.
Btw, Flesh is quite knowledgeable on this topic
They should sell rofers.
PlazeH
I am aware of ROFR. Not likely the same.
They should have been selling everything towards the peak,