RE:AnybodyTinley hasn't realized a PR in over 1-month, what kind of lip service do you expect to even hear from Rick geo?
Pabst recognized they were not a top priority and caught wind of the merger/acquisition and decided they needed their own facility, believe if or not that's the reality of the situation. Management probably didn't even realize Pabts was building a facility until they announced it publicly, wouldn't surprise me in the slightest. Pabst still isn't licensed to produce any drinks, the status is still pending....
How can you suggest Tinley's ignoring their own brand when they will be on shelves in Canada this month, like c'mon man, this isn't a walk in the park, there are only 3 other American branded cannabis drinks on shelves in Canada from America. Beckett's store count in AB is slowly increasing for the majority of non-alcoholic offerings, I wish we had store count for Beckett's in multiple U.S states and Canadian provinces.
Imitation if the sincerest form of flattery, Pabst building their own facility and promoting co-packing like Tinley is beyond proof of concept and indicative of demand for such services.
As for the MM's Geo, simply look at the data, it's obvious Tinley's being manipulated, myself and others have explained this dozens if not hundreds of times based on the trading activities, everything from spoofing to shorting PP's in advance of public knowledge to change the terms and conditions due to a lower share price. WhEN have you ever seen TNY do a raise above trading price? When pigs fly.... Did you ever hear of a hole in the wall geo?
Companies planning a private placement typically gauge the interest of institutional buyers before the offering is publicly announced. Regulators are concerned with this practice, called wall-crossing, as it might invite insider trading, especially when the potential investors are hedge funds. We examine privately placed common stock and convertible offerings and find widespread evidence of pre-announcement short selling. We show that pre-announcement short sellers are able to predict announcement day returns. The effects are especially strong when hedge funds are involved and when the number of buyers is high. Short selling practices that are happening with Tinley, it's clear as day, Abstract here, CLICK HERE!! TNYBF was 100% short yesterday, the highest short volume all month in terms of volume with 251k shares traded, ironic isn't it, considering the relentless repetitive distortion and belligerent lying by some users here and on other platforms. Tinley's market cap is trading near the costs to build the LBF, and not too far off the total funds raised in 6+ years, and someone/institution/institutions are shorting the stock instead of letting it run with postitive cannabis reforms happening in America, on the verge of expanding to CAD in days! Nothing to see geo...........
Not only is there shorting and distorting but management is silent in regards to official news beyond twitter fingers and Instagram sh!t. Short data below for tnybf for March.
TNYBF
- Short Volume Report (REGSHO)
All RegSho Dated reported by: FINRA
Historical Short Volume Data for TNYBF
| Date | Close | High | Low | Volume | Short Volume | % of Vol Shorted |
| Mar 31 | NA | NA | NA | 251,025 | 251,025 | 100.00 |
| Mar 30 | NA | NA | NA | 100,876 | 55,656 | 55.17 |
| Mar 29 | NA | NA | NA | 171,448 | 168,548 | 98.31 |
| Mar 25 | NA | NA | NA | 13,500 | 13,500 | 100.00 |
| Mar 24 | NA | NA | NA | 6,000 | 6,000 | 100.00 |
| Mar 23 | NA | NA | NA | 50,989 | 31,739 | 62.25 |
| Mar 22 | NA | NA | NA | 4,701 | 3,600 | 76.58 |
| Mar 21 | NA | NA | NA | 51,089 | 13,000 | 25.45 |
| Mar 18 | NA | NA | NA | 21,000 | 14,000 | 66.67 |
| Mar 17 | NA | NA | NA | 56,978 | 54,500 | 95.65 |
| Mar 16 | NA | NA | NA | 42,300 | 41,300 | 97.64 |
| Mar 14 | NA | NA | NA | 25,277 | 18,627 | 73.69 |
| Mar 11 | NA | NA | NA | 152,617 | 140,617 | 92.14 |
| Mar 10 | NA | NA | NA | 7,000 | 5,930 | 84.71 |
| Mar 09 | NA | NA | NA | 10,000 | 1,400 | 14.00 |
| Mar 08 | NA | NA | NA | 62,502 | 62,502 | 100.00 |
| Mar 07 | NA | NA | NA | 171,882 | 95,401 | 55.50 |
| Mar 04 | NA | NA | NA | 4,375 | 875 | 20.00 |
| Mar 03 | NA | NA | NA | 16,113 | 16,113 | 100.00
|
tnybf short data, click here! 10 signs Tinley's going to be acquired, you tell me if the company checks all the boxes. CEOs usually have a large stake in the company. Sometimes massively large. Whatever skin you’ve got in the game, they’ve got more.
If their stock drops inexplicably from $60 to $40, the CEO is taking a massive hit to their net worth.
If the company isn’t coming out with positive PR, or trying to reassure investors, it's possible they've already signed a deal to sell for $90. After all, what difference does it make if it the stock treads water between $40 and $60? In the CEO's mind, the deal is done.
Companies don’t like to see their stock prices plummet because it makes it harder for them to borrow money, or issue shares to raise capital. It’s also a matter of prestige. Being the CEO of a billion-dollar company is a bigger deal than being the CEO of a company worth 875 million.
Sometimes before a merger, Wall Street will crush a stock to shake out the ordinary investors. Their goal is to own as many shares as possible. If you own this stock, Wall Street can’t own it.
So, what is the company’s management saying? Are they being silent while the stock price plummets, or are going on a expletive-ridden tirade like Clover Health CEO, Vivek Garipalli?
A quiet CEO is hiding something. Especially if a merger is already agreed upon. They don’t care about the stock price anymore, because in their heads it’s not $40 or $30, or -22%, or whatever. The stock price in the CEO’s head is $90, so what’s there to panic about?