RE:RE:Day 14It does feel like that at some points. I would say they get the permit. I don't know if you've been watching all of the sessions but most of the government bodies are either satisfied with the EIS findings or giving minor recommendations. The only resistance I see is Crino which I think goes around looking for mine projects to bug and BIIGTIGONG NISHNAABEG first Nation. There was also a bit of resistance from health canada . As I keep mentioning thos groups keep attacking GenPgm without proof and without even visiting the site. This project has been years in the making I believe 2005 and a lot of data has been gathered. If you really wanna understand how underground water will be moving have a chat with management at Hemlo they have been there forever. I heard GenPgm's response about the overflowing and their 1 in 100 years scenario seems reasonable to me. For underground seepage I understood that the makeup of the rocks have minimal to no cracks keeping seepage to a minimum. I mean this is not the first or last mine on the area and it's easy to see that Hemlo with 30 or more year old technology managed to keep things under control. Finally after you get approval their are so many permits that need to be acquired which addresses most of the concerns. In the end it's up to federal and provincial government to accept or override the Panels recommendations whichever way it goes. I'm not saying it's a slam dunk but it does have a lot of positives going for it. I'm sure that panel thoroughly reviewed the EIS otherwise sufficiency would not have been granted.