RE:RE:RE:RE:Stockwatch Coverage SKECheck your Inbox
tannin wrote: Thanks el d, your response was a good read. And well done on nfg, don't own, wish I'd bt early. Totally agree, that for a major thinking of a bid for SKE, the huge new proximal land package implies a much longer term and/or larger operation, makes it open ended, adds spec appeal ....$X can justifiably be added to the bid.
Possibly of interest, my second largest gold holding is SGI, an Aussie operation, in production, and, of course, I think silly cheap. Could be right, uhmm, or wrong.
Cheers