RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Issue of creditability Bud, keep congratulating yourself, you might begin to believe you are dominating the game. Just remember its a game that you and very few others are playing. In the world of shorter term trades there are surely better candidates that WELL, and you yourself have pointed that out. Anyways, good for you with your predictions that the share price will go up, then down, then up, etc. In your world, with only two choices you are going to be right fifty per cent of the time. You need to remember that you predicted DOWN when share price was below $4.00. If instead you had predicted UP you would have been sitting on a 25 per cent gain. Maybe in your world of instant gratification you would have had to wait too long for 25 per cent. If everyone here thought as highly of themselves as you, there would be many on this board pointing out that they "called it" with revenues reaching $500 mill. Woohoo, look at us, we called it, we nailed it, we are the bomb. And I can add that most of us who were looking to the companies financials were not looking for instant recognition from "the market". We are watching the company grow in the right direction and on schedule. When you say, as you often do, that you want to see how "the market" reacts, what that means is that you want to see what everyone else is doing, and then you will follow the crowd. Thats a terrible way to invest and a terrible way to live your life generally. I read some great commentary form Monty over my holidays and esp the piece detailing how the results beat expectations for the quarter. The commentary demolishing concerns about "intangibles" was deadon. I value businesses in my line of work and the best and most reliable way to value a business is by assessing a company's ability to earn money. And quite often there is nothing else there in the way of assets or inventory or patents or software, etc., just a great niche and a consistent ability to generate income. If you had some real experience in the financial world you would know that these mythical "pros" you are in awe of have no greater ability to analyze companies than many on the board here. Just like the wizard in the Wizard of Oz. Look behind the curtain. Monty and others here on the board can go head to head with any of them. My approach, and I can acknowledge (unlike you) that it is not the only approach, is to keep it simple. We have a billion dollar company that is generating half a billion in revenues, revenues which continue to grow by acquisition and organically. Concerns about dilution are not relevant when you appreciate that market cap is number of share X value of shares. Costs of running this business are not increasing at the same rate as revenues and so its only a matter of time before we become profitable. We are in a sector which is growing, and which in fact has to grow. Numbers for revenue are pure and cannot be manipulated. Keep it simple. And by the way, no one here is in love with the company or the stock. We are all here to make money. The first hint of any stupidity or scandal and I will take my money and run without any regret. But everything is moving forward according to plan. Yeah me, I called it! $500 mill in annual revenues. Man oh Man I am on a roll!