RE:RE:FYI From Yahoo FinanceJoeStockIQ wrote: First and foremost, many thanks to Peach for taking the time to contact the EPA and sharing the results. Second, the EPA response is very close to what we've been espousing from the beginning, that is, there was never a problem with the permit itself AND this still all boils down to WHEN a certain EPA official signs off to actually get the process moving to the next stage of the public comment period. If you actually read the wording of the response, you'll quickly surmise they could get this started tomorrow if they so chose. The remainder of the unnecessary gobblygook in the response is nothing more than an excuse as to why they already haven't moved forward. BUT, as we have said all along, the final permit is in the bag. Stop the worrying and buy the dips until the date is ultimately announced. Need more information to illustrate our view has been correct all along? BB stated the EPA originally told management to expect end of February for the start of the public comment period and we believe him as he's recorded as saying so and he would never take the chance of potential blowback if he were caught embellishing the truth. Now, the same exact answer from the EPA is "sometime in Q2". Can't you finally see this now for what it is? Either a single person or a very small group of EPA'ites will move this forward when it fits their schedule. So, thanks again to Peach, stop worrying, buy any 20+ cent dips and get ready to ride the share price higher for Gawd's sake! Yet another week in the books of $4.65+ US copper, the money continues to pour in to finance the Florence Construction Fund, TGB is going higher, it's that simple.
Key phrase "when it fits their schedule." It sounds to me like the scheduling part is not the permit itself, but whatever administrative details go into the public comment period. I cannot imagine that takes much EPA personnel commitment, but I do not know.