COPPER KEG LAWSUIT, not a peep to shareholders.Is it not despicable that DCOP keeps its shareholders in the dark about MATERIAL events affecting the company adversely? While trying to squim its way out of my BC Supreme Court lawsuit in which it is a co-defendant and leave an in experienced individual to fend for himself, it appears to some that DCOP's CEO may perjured himself wrt his affidavit, potentially. TFB.
Contrary to DCOP's pumper NR's about acquiring more land, the FACT is that DCOP has acquired NO LAND whatsoever...period. DCOP has ONLY acquired 'mineral rights'. There is no mention in these DCOP pumper NR's of the large amount of residential private ppty, farming and ranching private ppty and grazing leases, nor of the RR private property, all of which are indeed LAND and with whom the owners of which DCOP will have to deal in order to do much else. Some of them are very anti-mining and anti any industrial developent/abuse of their presently peaceful area.
No mention eitherof the virtual mess of overlapping First Nation territorial claims in this area. There will be large challenges to overcome re permitting any ground disturbance whatsoever.
Having said all that, the Copper Keg is a RIPPER prospect, and I'd be shocked if a great deposit and maybe one or two other smaller peripheral ones aren't found there. That's why I staked it for David and me. Be like shootin' fish in a barrel there for me, anyway.
BTW...the first time I met Chris Healy, a couple years ago, nice guy, he told me that he knows virtually nothing about metal mineral exploration and would relie on me for guidance. Yer on yer own, Pal I have already shown you plenty.