RE:My defence of v_gmrmoribund wrote: People shouldn't allow themselves to be troubled so much by v_g's tirades. Some of his rants are by and large reasonable, some have an element of truth with an overlay of distortion, and some are total clap-trap.
But you can make a case that a healthy company is one that can face down hecklers and assorted detractors as it doggedly continues to build and move forward.
Think of Tesla. For years it was relentlessly hounded by armies of v_gs. Some were big money short sellers. Some may have just been people who, for whatever reason, didn't like Elon Musk or the idea of an electric car. They endlessly made up stuff. They even sent in spies, etc.
Next to this, v_g is nothing at all. Let him blabber on as he wishes. I will likely respond if he seems to me to be peddling stories that are false or misleading. But I wouldn't have him go away.
Actually, he provides useful tests of the company story. Sort of like a vigorous cross-examination.
V_g is an annoying poster that brings net negative value, so everyone should ignore him. He's a waste of time. Everyone that's interested in Quarterhill should just put him on ignore and then it's just like he has gone away. If you still read his posts, you're literally losing your time.
I'll disagree with you that, overall, what he provides something useful. That's like saying you might find something useful digging with your hands in a pile of dung.