RE:RE:RE:HLND revenue streamReaIInvestorII wrote: llllllllllllll wrote:
Net or gross revenues.Impossible to be NET??????
Can someone ask their friend to correct this
The combined company's "net" revenues will be "gross" after they subtract TAAT losses if they are anything like the $33 million they lost last year on Revenues of $2.56 million and the $7.3 million TAAT lost in Q1 on Revenues of $469K. Projected annualized rates would be about $2.0 million revenues and $29 million losses not including any costs/revenues associated with the HLND purchase.
I wonder how current businesses distributing "cigarette smoking related" products through HLND will react to a competitor owning their distributor and having full access to their marketing strategies and their costs and profits? That will be interesting but it is highly unlikely that TAAT investors will know anything about any potential conflicts of interest between current HLND customers who distribute products through HLND and the new ownership by a competitor. I see that a potential red flag warning but I'm sure others like Froggy will dismiss any concerns as bashing by the same poster Daryl and view the HLND purchase as only positive for TAAT investors so investors should buy more TAAT.
Time will tell.
I won't feel confident about TAAT's future SP growth potential until I hear about the Legend's opinion of possible conflicts as outlined above.
I already started buying TAAT again yesterday so it's full steam ahead unless the Legend advises caution.
Daryl has been soaking in a puddle of piss after he came to the realization that the Legendary Twattingham was correct all this time. Daryl cannot read, Daryl cannot write, Daryl cannot do math and Daryl sure as SHlT cannot read a stock chart. The Legendary Twatt occupys all of Daryl's useless headspace.