RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Bullboard...Funny Rumpl3StiltSkin that both "Gorf79 with an agenda" and his buddy "FGPStock with an agenda" don't comment on your example of Briacell going down -30% the day after a Fast Track Approval designation. Right there, you can see their agenda.
They were both insulted that we confronted their weak arguments and opposed them with facts.
They thought that their:
- "botched trial design" argument,
- "press release didn't include bullet points type of format" argument,
- "TLT management should have known about existence of shorts" argument,
- "TLT was responsabie of the bladder size issue" argument
were exact and they attacked TLT management, when in fact, all of these were goofy arguments at best. And when we opposed them with facts and perspectives, they say with don't accept differences of opinion. No. It's just that we don't accept people with a hidden agenda that cannot even come up prepared with legitimate arguments that have a minimum of seriousness and credibility.