RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:The point is....
where are you getting your information from? Someone was posting that the company has one 25 percent of Ionix. Where is that information? Ionix is from my understanding a wholky owned subsidiary of cryptoblox. Where was it that the company sold it off? They made Abarante the CEO of the company and he was working with Daymak. Daymak has about 10 million shares as to what I tracked from a few news releases which is a little less than 2 percent ownership overall. So if you are referring to dilution and whoever owns shares its non different than that going to retailers and depending who owns what it is shareholder ownership. I don't understand what people keep talking about and where they are getting their information all of which is not pressed anywhere and given this is all very significant information all this needs to be documented and a press should have been given in terms of sales ownership of company. That said I don't consider this the same as issuance of shares distributed by those who paid for them or were compensated by it. That said unless the ip is transferred over to any specified person or group or sold off it all belongs to the company which is not the same as the amount of shares owned by people paid in accordance to value of shares and those sold on the open market or there is under portfolio carried out by exchange rules. Until and unless there is a acquisition of ip as far as I am concerned it all belongs to cryptoblox. People keep making claims but I have not seen those claims being made anywhere corroborated by news releases. Like I said issuance of shares is not transfer over of intellectual property the only way I know of that is if there are mergers and acquisitions or if someone has commanding control of outstanding shares in which they hold control of the company but then you will have either people who work together or an internal power struggle where board members and management are forced out. So far whatever the tech is it is from what I see controlled by the company and sales are all beneficial to those who hold the shared and sell them at whatever price so again not too sure where all this question of ownership is coming from. But if people who keep raising these types of things can provide where they are referencing that will be greatly appreciated. There are lots of cheap shares but who has what is part of the puzzle. As far as I am concerned all the tech remains in company control but that also means whoever or whoever has controlling amounts makes the decisions and it may so happen that a person or group of people outside of Bryson and Abernate can gain control and possibly force them out that is if they have control and do that. Anyways I will not worry about any of all this