Anomalous gold mineralizationIf I could ask that management please try to provide better information. using the term "anomalous gold mineralization" is not much better than saying 'a hint' of gold. You are exploring a self proclaimed major orogenic zone with all the romance and potential of whatever your readers can dream. Yet, you do not show where the holes were located, what background gold is in the area, what the results were for other holes. It all speaks to softly saying that your best target was a bust.
As stock holders we want to know what you are up against and not have any wool pulled over our eyes. Many of us have been in this for the long haul when Dryden was the target. Please provide what your next target are and why they were not your first choice. Is this now becoming a stock of diminishing returns where you have actually sold off your prize possession for a hope and a dream. Lots of land does not mean potential unless you are a subdivision. Some of us have explored many sq. miles of Canada where nothing but moose were found.
Please lay out your strategy with reasons why your targets are as they might be so we can be in for the ride. And try not to be so creative by using a term that has no value such as anomalous gold mineralization. 5 ppb gold is anomalous to 3 ppb.