RE:RE:Our management groupWhich begs the question why Reyninak? Why not simply attach the nominal fee and kill the uncertainty, it's as if the company purposely withdrawals the fine details of certain areas to keep someone besides shareholders pleased. Likely due to M&A set in motion before Jeff's departure.
Co-packer agreements never have numbers attached which doesn't help analyst and investors estimate their own forward guidance to profitably since the company doesn't clarify anything in that regard.....
Some things never change, everything happening today were plans set in motion before Jeff stepped down, the idea of Tinley not having a permanent CEO and this current management team is the end all be all is not ideal and will change forcefully or cooperatively.....
"The Office of the CEO is doing great and has accomplished more in 6 months than pervious years. That has no reflection on stock price that is a different game."
Wtf has Tinley accomplished that is something new?
Are any of the co-packers announced recently new, or, were they in discussions when Jeff was CEO?
Tinley has 1 cannabis drink on the OCS and in a few dispensaries in ON, this would have happened whether or not Jeff stepped down, nothing new.
Beckett's, nothing new. No store locator, only a few additional locations in AB, n9 in store demos with that Todd fella, no alcohol added to the best sellers.
Lakewood transfer, nothing new.
More people besides Jeff should step down and simply hire someone to take this company to the next level, everyone publicly involved on the board has been there for years with the exception of Ricky Talati and the new CFO.
Tinley's announced 4 co-packers since Jeff stepped down, all co-packers were likely in discussions before he stepped down, pffft....
Let's see if financials are on time, isn't May 2nd the deadline?