RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Financials Update:Focus on ChinaPandora wrote: GrahamB wrote: jopatclo wrote: rkula15 wrote: Once again thanks for taking care of us and thanks for your concern on a stock that upu don't even own. I hope you take care of all the shareholders of all the venture stocks. Venture stocks are a risk and we assume the risk, we know that. We are here for the potential. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting a different result. You must be insane. We still don't want to hear from you.
exactly what I think of Granham... the savior who wants to do everything to denigrate VPT and George A.
Interesting and telling that the only response to a factual summary of the companies finacials is negative, to malign the poster, and to avoid discussing the consistent losses of the company, continued failure to make a single sale, and the lack of follow up on stated objectives of management.
Note that this data is company data posted on sedar. It isn't my data, it is company data posted by management.
If this is bashing, the company is bashing.
I am simply posting it and discussing it.
It is what the company is doing, and comparing it to what they said they would do, to understand the effectiveness of management.
The failure quarter after quarter to make a sale, zero sales, isn't bashing: its a fact.
The fact that some here choose to insult those who analyze factual data, and paint a narrative, is telling and to me a red flag.
There are probably a dozen, two dozen, three dozen or more on here that recognize all the same stuff as you keep reciting but they do not incessantly post it to tick everybody off. They just accept it for what it is. Those that don't like it enough or can't take it they just leave quietly. They don't make persistent fools of themselves. Maybe you could do the same - we really don't need your input, such as it is.
So ,if I understand you correctly, posting factual data and holding management acccountable to what they have stated as objectives, and guidance, using company published data should be quietly accepted. Yet, posters like jopatchglo that represent more than 50% of the posts(over 10 on my screen) are acceptable, when the substance of such posts are to spec ulate on a buyout, talk about lube, and speculate on the location of trade booths at a conference are perfectly acceptable. In fact, not one of you has objected and often cheer on such unsubstantiated speculation: maybe the buyout will be 1.00,5.00,20.00....
I think this action, and inaction, respectively to support a narrative that is speculative, and promotional, tells a very different story.
Hey there are hundreds of views, and only a few promoters that dislike facts.
What does that say?
Caveat emptor newbies.