RE:RE:RE:Dont know why vinny hides under scarlets dresss
one path for someone of 20 years experience in pennies it sure doesn't looking that. Correct me if I am wrong you also inevitably said you lost on this one. And no I am not naive just kept to my promise in case you keep missing it. I will in the future keep my plans and prices to myself. Now I have already said however what they are through this year and first quarter end next and what I will start doing knowing how things go not only in pennies but all the rest. You keep missing the point as to why I have constantly said call Daymak it sure in hell doesn't have anything to them calling any of this company's shots not unless they buy them out and take control. Oh no that is not it at all. I think you are trying to deflect and distract here. I told you why to call and that has to the issue surrounding truths and finding out just how much of a fraud is here. Remember to prove it you must establish thus company had no intent to pursue anything and deliberately sat by promoting as they did. Ionix was and still is a wholly owned subsidiary of blox again you are confusing the issue regardless of whether the battery and ev division is now spun out it is not as someone wrongly said a 3rd party not in the strictest sense. Those who hold shares here in blox will make it a point to hold lots of shares in Ionix BUT for the rest of is as I went through lengths of stating it amounts to fractional shares and that too most likely after a consolidation. These are not 3rd parties in relation to management but a restructuring legally done to take advantage of lower taxes and different funding in essence management is still being paid but in a different way. Is it a shell and are any of these a shell? Well that depends on what constitutes a shell company and how one is talking. It is not at all again illegal to have shell companies because what they are are companies that are listed and assessing what direction they want to pursue such as was the case here in which I would rather see them possibly as a holding company. Why that well given that Ionix is still wholly owned subsidiary blox has that asset class division of ev and batteries etc. If it was divested and sold off to a third party another company and blox has no idea where next without pivoting into the crypto then I would call Blox a true shell company not otherwise. Blox already decided to pivot and pursued the crypto and still has rights as we all do to Ionix so we will either have .25 or so fractional share to every whole share which is correct as to what is being said BUT not 0. Will the percentages change as to less than a quarter of a share after consolidation hard to say they shouldn't it may be possible the fractional if the company is doing well can also bump up but legally we will get some shares once spun out. It is clear it will go that way. So having said this again the whole point isn't that Daymak has any control over this company but to establish intent and seeing what has been intended has been fulfilled by a wholly owned subsidiary of Blox Ionix as the extension so the company not only follows what is required by the exchange But has shown no wrongful doing and in fact the opposite what they said they would. As far as your citing the supply chain issue that is irrelevant as to what your central argument of a legal battle is and as I said before you have nadda as the company has fulfilled everything asked of it by the exchange and as we decide to gamble our dollars we have effectively agreed to the Exchange terms caveat warning chose any word. So you can think that I am naive all you want and whatever else BUT that will do nothing in regards to a legal challenge you will not at all succeed at or the shares going sub .03 good luck to both as the probabilities are extremely low both cases. This would have gone sub .04 by now if sub .03 had any chance. Now given how the company has been truthful about the batteries by extension they are truthfully looking to establish the crypto side of things but whether success or not that is just the way it is. Will they restructure optimal spin it out they can and again people won't like that as well but as with Ionix yes they can however if the revenues is strong enough and as I suspect there will already be a consolidation I don't think we need to worry about that. I bring it up so people understand that companies can do whatever the hell they want to restructure according to exchange rules whether we like it or not that is just the reality. Ideally they avoid doing all this but if you see a history of companies blowing up their share counts or even before all that take monies out avoid all this. Anyways onthepath I am done answering you even if you keep insulting me either directly or indirectly while tensioning to others posts that involve my mention I know my game I am not the one whinning looking to sue people last I checked you are and that is not becoming of someone who calls another naive. You wouldn't be such a girl if you were man enough to just accept how things go vs projecting your feminity to me. Yup I am the girl with the skirt. Sheesh! But like I said you go do what you need to but this only us showing an up trajectory with an inevitable most likely 10 to one consolidation unless there is really strong early revenues upwards of 50 million dollars however I agree let's just first see revenue. I am nonetheless done with you for sure.