RE:RE:RE:I didn't get an email about anything yet..."General" no agenda is insignificant,
what is in the document from Sedar is there should be documents sent out from what I can see, as they distinguish what gets sent to NOBO's(non-objecting beneficial owners) and OBO's (objecting beneficial owners) ...
I believe there are similar rules in the U.S. as stated here:
"Under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules, companies mainly communicate with beneficial owners through broker or bank intermediaries. Intermediaries are prohibited from disclosing to a company the identity of beneficial owners who object to that disclosure (objecting beneficial owners or OBOs), and the company cannot contact OBOs directly. The company may contact directly shareowners who do not object (non-objecting beneficial owners or NOBOs), but SEC rules nonetheless require that proxy materials be forwarded to them by the intermediaries. The OBO/NOBO distinction impedes company communications with beneficial owners and communications among shareowners. Some market participants have proposed changes to this framework" Comments on S7-14-10: Study of the OBO/NOBO System (sec.gov)
...anyone here want to chime in?! It may only be related to major shareholders of record and institutions?
two...