Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

FormerXBC Inc XEBEQ

Xebec Adsorption Inc designs, engineers, and manufactures products that are used for purification, separation, dehydration, and filtration equipment for gases and compressed air. The company operates in three reportable segments: Systems, Corporate and other, and Support. Its product lines are natural gas dryers for natural gas refueling stations, compressed gas filtration, biogas purification, associated gas, engineering services, and air dryers. The company's geographical segments are United States, Canada, China, Other, Korea, Italy, and France.


GREY:XEBEQ - Post by User

Post by Motownwingon May 12, 2022 9:45am
163 Views
Post# 34677323

More details needed on impact of legacy projects

More details needed on impact of legacy projectsConsidering their technical leadership position and comparable benchmarks, their GM% should at a minimum in the 27-30% range (20-25% on systems and 40-50% on aftermarket activities incl spare parts). That level of GM will be required for them to reach their strat plan goal of adjusted EBITDA of 8-10% by fiscal year 2024. For the last quarter, the gap is huge between a GM of 11% and let's say 28% on sales of 41 M$ =  gap of 7 M$.
IMO, they would need to detail the loss provision they had to take on the legacy projects versus GM performance on the rest of their sales of non-legacy stuff. It is fairly obvious that the operational performance issues run deeper than just the 'legacy' projects.
I suspect that they also have a sales pricing issue. Knowing that they have good technology, it is fairly easy to book orders and build backlog if your pricing is too low considering market conditions with crazy inflation. It takes discipline and leadership to sell at a price that will allow you to make money despite the challenging conditions. A huge backlog booked on bad pricing is a recipe for disaster. Hopefully, management will provide enough detailed information today to reassure the market. JIMO GLTA 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse