RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Speaking Of "Marner" . .Well it is not like it couldn't happen here. Hunting rifles would have been just as effective in that case and I am not sure that isn't what those two hicks used. I am not for banning hunting rifles either although hopefully you would use them to hunt animals and then lock them up. I see no reason for handguns or semi-automatic or automatic weapons here. If you can't kill an animal with a bolt action rifle then go home and read about becoming a better man.
If the buffalo shooter was using a bolt action rifle I amsure someone would have got to him. A five round clip seems like more than enough ammo to take down whatever herd you are hunting too.
I am sure the security guard at TOPS would have rushed him duing the lull if thought there was going to be one. It's just too bad he didn't aim for his head.
FiddyFiddyOddzz wrote: I figured it would be just a matter of time before you cited the Ahmaud Arbery case...LOL
Those fellow made a mistake for sure, hey, it happens from time to time...
Quin wrote:"Yeah he could have got himself and the old lady killed in the ensuing gun battle for property that wasn't even his.
If you can afford a $100,000 car you can afford to let it go and have the insurance company replace it. Chasing after gun-toting criminals is the job of law enforment professionals lest the good guy happens upon a jogger minding his own business and pops a round or two in him by mistake.
https://www.npr.org/2020/11/13/934862159/father-and-son-charged-with-murder-in-ahmaud-arbery-killing-are-denied-bond "