RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Speaking Of "Marner" . . Pretty sure I proved to you that guns don't deter crime, and that in fact they invite crime. But here you are, ignoring facts and sticking to your guns (literally!).
FiddyFiddyOddzz wrote: Most people are against handguns until they become a helpless victim of a violent crime. The problem is the gangsters and thugs don't seem to give a Fiddler's Fcuk what you think, what the cops think, or what the courts think. In fact, the courts are 99 % of the problem. The cops lock 'em up, the courts slap their wrsits and release them. Catch and release in Can-Er-DUH has been an EPIC fail, although it has provided infinite job security for the country's po-po.
Why wouldn't a thug take your mother's car at gun point ? He KNOWS she doesn't have a pistol in her purse and he KNOWS if he does get caught he gets a wrist slap, is released on bail, and is home in time for supper.
Since the tugs have no incentive to stop doing what they're doing, then I feel having something to fight back with like a legal handgun really is the only option. I don't see spineless Can-Er-DUH invoking a "Three Strikes And You're Out" law in my lifetime.
In quite a few front windows of the homes I saw in Florida over the winter, I saw a sign that read" No trespassing, this house is protected by God and a gun, If you trespass, you will meet them both"
Perhaps if we had warnings like that here bcked up by a firearm in the home, those folks the other night in Toronto wouldn't have had their Lambo jacked during a home invasion. Maybe, just maybe, the cowardly punks that broke in to their home might have thought twice if the possibility of having their nuts blown off was on the table.
https://toronto.citynews.ca/2022/05/19/lamborghini-stolen-vehicle-etobicoke/
Quin wrote:"Well it is not like it couldn't happen here. Hunting rifles would have been just as effective in that case and I am not sure that isn't what those two hicks used. I am not for banning hunting rifles either although hopefully you would use them to hunt animals and then lock them up. I see no reason for handguns or semi-automatic or automatic weapons here. If you can't kill an animal with a bolt action rifle then go home and read about becoming a better man.
If the buffalo shooter was using a bolt action rifle I amsure someone would have got to him. A five round clip seems like more than enough ammo to take down whatever herd you are hunting too.
I am sure the security guard at TOPS would have rushed him duing the lull if thought there was going to be one. It's just too bad he didn't aim for his head. "