RE:RE:NEWS, NEWS, read all about itJust to be clear, I'm an absolute believer in GRO's technology end a definite longholder. I am convinced that this technology will be implementend in many greenhouses in the future. Especially when you realize that the global production of sufficient food for all of mankind is becoming increasingly complicated and therefore expensive due to (regional) climate changes such as drought in large parts of the world. So we need to be able to produce more food per m2, more efficiently and with less harm to the environment.
Anyway, what amazes me though is that CO2 Grow, as a company seems to focus primarily on trials at potential buyer's sites. GRO's technology has long been proven so why not just sell the technology and move on to the next buyer? Each of these trials take a very long time to finish and in the end the result seems to be the same every time; more output, better pest control, better working conditions for greenhouse personnel and almost zero CO2 emission into the (greenhouse) atmosphere. And a sale of course!
So my point is, should GRO not better direct their energy to direct sales (i.e. with existing customers as reference) as it is an already long proven technology. And build a crtitical mass this way to spread the word. All these trials at relatively small grower's sites (500m2.......come on!!) will not make this company grow very fast, right?
Can anyone comment please?