Good post kirktopThat is one of the problems with Tinley's is that posters don't actually do back of the envelope projections of what this company is doing financially.
There are very few cannabinoid infused bottlers that are making money so you have to look at future value because most are in the build stage. Law and policy needs lots of work to be classified as open-armed and it is the big players who will have to do the lobbying to make changes for free-enough enterprise such that our skus can actually access the legal market.
It is going to be difficult for Tinley's to not give us meaningful numbers as we are being told that we have crossed the t's and dotted the i's. And bottling revenue is supposed to be upfront.
Of course you have to hit the tipping point where you become profitable and I suspect that increasing our bottling capacity is keeping us from breaking out to profitability. Pretty brave for our management to add cans and minis and pasteurizers in anticipation of needing these to round ourselves out as a co-bottler. Don't discount the increased capacity and potential revenue.
None of our development stage has gone as smoothly as we would have liked, especially by comparison to others who seemed to be viable in record times by comparison.
They are going to be roadblocked over the same market laws and policy that Tinley's is, waiting for the people that watchdog businesses and run resistance to business being able to do business the way they see fit.
Tinely's is International with the most valuable markets being California and Canada. How much of our own skus is unknown so difficult to do financial projections to get a finger on the pulse of the health of our efforts.
Tinley has had a spot on the buzzboard at Stockhouse which is indicative of investors and posters reading and following developments. It is positive that we have held that position amongst some namebrand potpreneurs and I look at it as a good thing such that at least we have interest from the investment community that there could be some positive development which of course comes from the common denominator of earnings and profits.
Tinley's could be viable at this level or it could choose to grow into more States and Countries.
There are other options if we can't get enough traction with our existing line of skus and co-bottling revenue. CBD or alcohol could be skus of potential or we could go the route of boutique supplier of unique strains. There is also the huge energy drink, health drink market or we could go the whole distance and get some of our stuff through the regulations to become bona-fide listed drugs. I'm thinking thing that somebody should be working that weight-loss angle.
As a longtime shareholder of Tinley's, I believe, that it isn't the time to bail because we could be profitable in the next couple of quarters and I still believe that we have suitors lurking around who might fast-track themselves by buying us out.
glta and dyodd