Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tinley Beverage Company Inc C.TNY

Alternate Symbol(s):  TNYBF

The Tinley Beverage Company Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures a line of non-alcoholic, cannabis-infused beverages for use in California, United States and in Ontario, Canada. The Company also manufactures cannabis-infused beverages for contract manufacturing clients. It offers terpene and cannabis-infused non-alcoholic Tinley's '27 and Tinley's Tonics products, for distribution to licensed dispensaries and home delivery channels in California. The Beckett's Classics and Beckett's '27 lines of non-alcoholic, terpene-infused non-cannabis versions of these formulations are available in select mainstream food, beverage, and specialty retailers in the United States as well as in select grocery and specialty stores in Canada. Its subsidiaries include Hemplify Inc., Algonquin Springs Beverage Management LLC, Beckett’s Tonics California Inc., Beckett's Tonics Canada Inc., Tinley's Canada Inc., and Lakewood Libations Inc.


CSE:TNY - Post by User

Comment by Pedronocentson May 27, 2022 5:57pm
109 Views
Post# 34713572

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Posted on FB - worth reading!

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Posted on FB - worth reading!Unfortunately shareholders will only get answers that are on paper infront of their eyes. Rather than being able to ask questions and hold the people in charge accountable. Based on what had been said about producing hundreds of thousands, which probably were just test runs for the most part rather than income producing product. You can expect no better than 200k as the best case results. Reality and past performance would indicate that results might be better than the 80k but will not match 180k. Remember during these times they had been upgrading and installing other equipment. Those will be excuses and supply chain will be other excuses. Expect no breakdown of Becketts/Tinleys/copackers. Tinleys BOGO do very little for bottomline as they are providing product as a loss leader to expose it to new potential customers. None of the runs during the reporting quarter were at 20k, they might run an occassional product once in a blue moon now but that is not a normal Tinleys run. Shoot them off an email and ask them how many and how often and what size a typical run is. That is not information which can not be shared. But I bet you dollars to donuts they don't tell you. Results will be dissapointing just like Canopy. Not bashing, but at least I'm not crying about the American President and him giviing a taco or two away.


kirktop wrote: Thanks sneakysneaky for responding rationally with DATA rather than whining. I'm not bashing the company. I'm a shareholderr that wants the stock to go up but also wants answers about why its not. Management is on the hook for showing shareholders big revenue next week because of all the copacking runs they posted on twitter. DATA: Someone posted that they bottle 20K per run which means $12K revenue at 60 cents per bottle. If they're lazy and just do 1 run per week, revenue should be $190K per quarter from one line. Why was it only $80K last quarter?  They have 3 bottling lines so it should be 2 or more runs per week which is nearly $400K. This is still a lame work schedule. They also posted a run of one of their '27 products which sells for $20 on budee. If they only sell for $10 to budee and 20K bottle run like their copacking runs then revenue should be another $200K. All together, this is $600K US or $800K Canadian. How do they justify just $80K last quarter? There is no excuse for at lease 2 of the 3 lines to not be working hunky dorry by now for this entire quarter because bottling and mini has been running for 1 year. They also twitter posted can runs which is the third line. My beef withh the company is it's always excuses. $800K means just 2 copacking runs per week and 1 run of their own product for the WHOLE quarter. Two days of work per week is not too much to ask for management that pays themselves a million dollars each quarter.  If they don't show this kind of revenue next week, they need to take a huge pay cut or replace with management that goes to work FIVE days per week and makes product not twitter posts. What revenue do you nonbasher people think our all star management team will show next week?


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>